![]() ![]() They can be found used for under $200.)Ĭanon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM. AFAIK, there's no difference optically and these were discontinued some time ago. used, MPB.com has more copies of this lens than any other lens in their inventory: 154 to choose among, many under $100! (Note: There have been other versions of this lens with IS and faster USM focus drive. The primary "advantages" of the EF 75-300mm are it's 50mm additional focal length and low cost.Ĭanon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III. They're older and the STM version seems to have the best image quality of the bunch.)Ĭompare image quality tests yourself at The-Digital-Picture website. I wish it were metal! (Note: There also is are versions of this lens without STM. One minor negative is that the 55-250mm uses a polycarbonate bayonet mount. It also is closer focusing, able to render higher magnification, slightly smaller and a little lighter in weight. but from 135mm and longer the EF-S 55-250mm is much sharper. It and the EF 75-300mm have pretty similar image quality between 70 and 100mm. ![]() It uses Canon ET-63 matched lens hood, which is sold separately but recommended to protect the lens and improve images. The main things are that it has faster, quieter autofocus STM (stepper motor) focus drive and IS (Image Stabilization) which is particularly helpful with telephoto lenses such as this. The EF-S 55-250mm IS STM lens is a better lens in almost every way. It's lightly built, doesn't have particularly smooth focus/zoom rings, uses slower & noisier "micro motor" focus drive, doesn't have image stabilization and has pretty soft image quality at the longer focal lengths. ![]() However, it's Canon's cheapest telephoto zoom and the reasons will probably become apparent once you start using it. Yes the EF 75-300mm III lens will fit and work on a 250D (called S元 in N. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |